My blog has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 4 seconds. If not, visit
and update your bookmarks.

Monday, November 29, 2010

The Big Campaign Finance Story of 2011: An Effective End to Public Financing -- Rick Hasen

Loyola Law School | Faculty Blog: "This development is significant because the Court is likely to take away one of the only tools available to drafters of public financing measures to make such financing attractive to candidates. Public financing has a number of benefits, including reducing the threat of corruption and the appearance of corruption, providing a jump start for new candidates who are not professional politicians, and freeing up candidates and officeholders to have more time to interact with voters. But rational politicians who are serious candidates will not opt into the public financing plan unless they think they will be able to run a competitive campaign under the public financing system. The whole point of the extra matching funds in the Arizona plan is to give candidates assurance they won't be vastly outspent in their election. While an adverse ruling by the Supreme Court in McComish would not mean that all public financing systems would be unconstitutional, it would eliminate one of the best ways to create effective public financing systems."

But the Campaign Legal Center doesn't think this case will be that big of a deal.

No comments:

Post a Comment